Why Google Slides is the default
It costs nothing, almost everyone already has an account, and the editor is familiar enough that putting a deck together does not require a decision about which tool to use. For a lot of client-facing work, that reflex is fine: the deck gets made, the link gets sent, the meeting happens. The friction shows up later, when someone actually needs to know whether the client opened it, or wants to keep an outside party from forwarding the link freely.
Where it breaks down for client sharing
Three specific gaps, not a general complaint about the tool:
- No real per-viewer tracking. Slides does not log individual opens with a timestamp and viewer identity on a standard account. The closest thing, Workspace activity reporting, is an admin feature most people sending decks do not have access to.
- No standalone password. Access control means "anyone with the link" or "restricted to specific Google accounts." A client without the right account, or without wanting to sign in at all, either gets full open access or gets blocked outright.
- No arbitrary interactivity. If the source material is HTML, generated by an AI tool or otherwise, with live charts, custom scripts, or interactive sections, none of that survives being ported into Slides. It becomes static text and native shapes.
Option 1, LiveSend
If the deck already exists as HTML, or you export it and want a tracked link instead of a Slides share, LiveSend logs every view with timestamp, optional viewer email via an email gate, country, and time spent. Add a real password (works for anyone, no Google account required), set an expiration, edit inline without changing the URL.
Honest trade-offs: 3MB (6MB for Pro) cap per HTML file, a small LiveSend watermark on the Free plan, no native slide-editing experience, you are working with HTML rather than a deck editor.
Use it when: the client-facing document already is, or can be, HTML, and you need real tracking and a password that does not depend on a Google account.
Option 2, DocSend
If the deck stays a deck and PDF is an acceptable export format, DocSend gives page-by-page engagement data and NDA gating, purpose-built for that exact shape of document.
Use it when: the deck is genuinely presentation-shaped and a PDF export loses nothing that matters.
Option 3, Tiiny.host
For a quick static HTML host with a password option on paid plans and basic aggregate analytics, Tiiny.host is a stable, established choice if per-viewer detail is not required.
Use it when: aggregate counts are enough and setup speed matters more than tracking depth.
Picking the right option
Internal review, no client involved: Google Slides is still fine, nothing here applies. Sending to a client and you need to know if and when they opened it, plus a password that works without a Google account: LiveSend. Presentation-shaped and PDF is fine: DocSend. Just need a link, no tracking depth required: Tiiny.host.