The prototype is ready, sharing is the actual blocker
Two years ago, generating a functional prototype required a developer. Today, v0, Bolt, Lovable, and Claude turn a paragraph of description into working HTML in minutes. The new bottleneck is not generation. It is getting the prototype in front of the client without needing a developer to ship it. The recommended paths (push to GitHub, configure Vercel, point a domain) assume engineering skills that the person who generated the prototype often does not have.
Option 1, LiveSend
LiveSend is purpose-built for the "I have HTML, I want a link, I do not write code" case. The workflow:
- Copy the HTML output from your AI tool (or download the .html file).
- Paste it into LiveSend. The system returns a permanent URL.
- Send the URL to the client. Optionally turn on the email gate and the password.
No Git, no command line, no deploy step. Every view is logged with timestamp, optional viewer email, country, and time on the page. You can edit text inline without changing the URL. Trade-offs: 3MB (6MB for Pro) cap per file, small LiveSend watermark on the Free plan, no custom domain yet.
Option 2, Tiiny.host
Tiiny.host is the most established drop-and-share host. Drag the .html file into the upload box, get a URL. Their Chrome extension can publish directly from Claude or ChatGPT. Paid plans add password and custom domain. No inline editor, no per-viewer email gate.
Option 3, vibeshare.page
Free, anonymous, no account. Paste HTML, get a link. No tracking, no password, no controls. For a quick share where the recipient is someone you trust and the document is disposable, it is the lowest possible friction.
Option 4, ask a developer to deploy it
If the prototype will live for months, needs a custom domain, or depends on a backend, the right move is to hand it to a developer and have them deploy to Vercel or similar. The setup cost is meaningful but pays off when the artifact becomes a real piece of the product. For one-off client demos, that overhead is wasted.
What the client sees vs what you see
On a no-code host like LiveSend, the client opens the URL and sees the rendered prototype, full screen, no chrome. On your side, the dashboard shows when they opened it, from where, and how long they stayed. If you turned on the email gate, you also know exactly which recipient viewed it. That asymmetry is the entire point: the client gets a clean experience, you get the data you need to know whether the prototype landed.
Picking the right option
One-off client demo, no developer, want tracking: LiveSend. Same but you also want a Chrome extension from inside ChatGPT or Claude: Tiiny.host. Quick personal share, no controls needed: vibeshare.page. Prototype becoming a real product: developer plus Vercel.